Friday, October 7, 2011

Like a kid in a candy shop....




was how i felt.for so many years i have seen thee great players online, on tv, print-never thought i would see them in person once and talk to them (ok not really much of a conversation but still B-) ). i booked a day to bilbao in my europe trip and it was well rewarded - to meet these players and see chucky crush nakamura in a time scramble....i am so excited even right now just to think about it....

check the photos and videos at:

http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150411590550815.413945.722980814&l=b11c7801f3&type=1

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Back....

2010 was not too fruitful in terms of chess ratings (in terms of standings -yes - I came second, again, in southwest open and US class championship). I wasn't able to play too many tournaments after moving to Austin and due to my two sojourns to India for few months. Then I got married and you know what it means for chess :-)

However, I good news is that I am a chess expert now - probably I realized what I was doing wrong - and that was - not playing enough tournaments. So i played in lot of local tournaments and gained significant points in a couple of months. The last tournament which finally took me over 2000 was near perfect in terms of my play. I defeated both the jiang kids in the final two rounds, that was satisfying, especially considering that one of them spoiled my southwest open party :-I

here is a position from one of the earlier tournaments in april:


Alok K - Anthony N

Some bad transposition of the opening led me to this. At this point, I was concerned for a moment, before suddenly realizing that white is winning here. 15. Nxe6 should win for white in all variations. From here on, it was not perfect, but I managed to win the point.

here is another:


Alok K, Gucer V

This was absolutely winning for white, but I got the idea implemented in a wrong way. The correct approach would have been to fix the black pawns by exf6, and then proceed to gobble the b and d pawns. The white king can not defend those coz of the white pawns on the outside, and the black bishop would not be sufficient to defend against a combined attack of white bishop and king. Instead I started immediately to attack the b pawn by (possibly) Bd4 to Ba5 and K to Kb3. That, obviously didn't work as black managed to trade off kingside pawns and even with a pawn down, he could sac his bishop for the last white pawn.

Anyways, reflecting on what I was doing wrong so far, here is a list which might help somebody else picking up chess in his adult years:

1. Concentrate too much on openings:
Openings are important, especially in quick games. but most of the wins and losses <2000 level comes from middlegame mistakes. Focusing too much on openings also made me develop a habit of moving quicker (since I knew the standard opening moves), getting used to making moves faster even in the middle game, and making more mistakes.

2. Not playing enough tournaments:
I can not focus on this enough. If you want a 100 point increase in your USCF ratings, consider playing 10-15 tournaments on an average for that. You might get lucky and win 100 points in 3 tournaments, but it seems to me that around 9-15 points seem to be the average points gain/tournament.

There is another reason to play more tourneys however. And that is due to the strange USCF rules, calculating your performance rating by adding 400 points to your highest rated opponent if you score perfectly. Playing a lot of tournaments gives you that option....the more you play the more chances are that you would score 3-0 or 4-0 in smaller tourneys which would easily offset any losses.

3. Practice tactics:
This one requires no explanation. first and foremost chess is a game of combinations and <2000 level, most of the games are decided in one form or other by tactics. Get a good tactics book (or mail me for a list) and practice daily. and practice on the board with real pieces, not on the computer to give yourself a good board vision.

4. No/not enough physical activity:
I could not believe that I was not tired in my last tournament even after I woke up early and played tennis for 1.5 hours just before the tourney. Usually by the 3-4 game, my head would be spinning. I do not know the scientific reason, but I guess physical activities improve the blood circulation and supply to your brain (ok, stop laughing-this was just a theory :-) ). Now i am not saying you do a marathon before a chess match, but consider having enough physical activity (swimming, running etc etc) in your weekly schedule.

5. good sleep and food:
there was a survey (cant recall the link now) among the musicians - the crux of which was that apart from practice, the second most important things they pointed out for good performance was adequate sleep. the same goes for what you eat during the tourney also. Chess is a very strenuous game and you need the energy to play long games.

6. Fight for the points:
Do not, especially in your growing phases (in terms of ratings), settle for a draw. Take a draw when it is the only outcome, but fight for every point - which might mean taking some risks. You would learn much more, and the more you press yourself, the more you would try to find better moves on the board to pressurize your opponent. Similarly, do not prematurely resign (ok, i am not suggesting to play till checkmate though).

I would not dare to suggest that this would work for everybody, just sharing my own experience.











Monday, September 7, 2009

austin city blitz tournament

Last saturday it was my second visit to Austin chess club. and I must say there are a lot of things San Antonio chess club (SACC) can learn from them - at least I was impressed.

To start with:
1. Drew S does a fantastic job of inducing that welcome feeling in the club and is very very approachable. Full marks for him.
I tried to do this on Friday casual chess nights in Borders when I was in San Antonio, but I must say somehow you dont feel it in SACC-though to be fair, I would not say that
SACC people are not friendly. Maybe they just need to show it more and in a better manner.
2. Lorry managed the Austin city blitz tournament very well. In an embarrassing incident (involving me of course :-) ), I completely forgot I move I just made- I though I played my rook
from b3 to b2 to f2, but in effect I made it move directly from b3 to f2. And not only that, I was thoroughly convinced that I moved it from b3 to b2 to f2. thankfully, there was
a spectator who saw my illegal move and I realized that I might be wrong.
3. Though personally I still fell that the rule of charging $10 extra to non austin chess club members is complicated, I can understand that since they provide the sets and clocks,
it is logical.
4. If you have any question about any rule-you can get a pretty good explanation and answer from Drew. I can just compare it to our SACC TD Martin Gordon whose only reply to
any query is - "Its tournament director's discretion". Anyways, there are many stories about how imbalanced and illogical some of the decisions in San Antonio tournaments have been
in the past, it would suffice to say that the tournament director behaved far from ideal (and fair). In some cases I doubt that he even thought about the decisions,
it was more of a case of speaking first without thinking, and then justifying whatever has been said. In any case, the tournament organization have room for improvement.
5. i was pleasantly surprised to see the thank you statement from drew for san antonio players who participated in the tourney. again +1 for him and austin chess club.

i am sure that some of my views could possibly be biased coz of my bad experiences in san antonio tournaments, but unfortunately there are many other players both in san antonio, and other cities who would concur to my observations.

anyways, for the time being, i am taking time off from chess and concentrating on my new job. maybe by nov end i would be in shape to play a tournament. till then....

Saturday, July 4, 2009

disaster strikes

world open has gone horribly bad so far for me. i lost 5 of my past 7 games - the last time i lost 5 games it took 6 months and 5 tournaments....looking back at the games, i think i am getting blind when playing with the real chess board, on the computer screen i rarely miss a move - here i dropped an entire rook in a winning position, and lost numerous pawns in other games. not sure how to increase the board vision, except practising always on a real board. lets see how i do in the remaining 2 games.


Tuesday, June 30, 2009

so it begins....

i mean the blog :-) funny thing how i like all words starting with "z" - and to the credit of german language, chess terminology is full of them.

anyways, this is my space to add to the growing list of frustated amateurs who never really understand why their game (and more visibly their ratings) never improve. now i do not want to convey the impression that everybody could be a GM, but at the same time, i do not believe that one doesnt improve at all if he really tries to.after all, as a famous author said, u can reasonably expect to become a world class player in any sport, if u devote 10000 hours of systematic study.

i am a decent 1900 uscf player right now, and to be fair, i just started the systematic study around a year back. before that all the chess i knew consisted of some simple tactics, the what-ifs, and a basic understanding of the mate patterns. but like many others, the hard part is going beyond this, and the first step in that direction would be to cross 2000.

looking back at my games, one thing is for sure-i missed many wins (some against masters and experts) simply coz i play too fast-or rather without thinking. and many i lost from a drawn position coz of the same reason. and i think in chess, one is only as good as his weakest move. funny enough, (or tragic whichever way u look at it), i was NEVER in time trouble in any of my games, whether i won, drew or lost. and i mean even in G/30 games. so, first thing i need to do is time management, and play slow. lets see how much it helps.

i am going to play in the world open this year in U2000 category - hope to perform better than my last tournament.